April 21, 2021

$4.2 million fine upheld for California homeowner’s blocking of beach access

A $4.2 million nice in opposition to a Surfing LA`s recent blog post Malibu house owner for blocking off Surfing published an article beach entry used to be allowed through an appeals court docket to face.

The Lents’ home is at heart, with the fairway awning. (Google symbol) 

The ruling filed Monday issues the Las Flores Surfing LA`s recent blog post beach house owned through Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Warren Lent and his spouse, Henny.

The home, at the Pacific Coast Freeway, used to be constructed within the early Eighties underneath a allow that required a five-foot-wide public-access easement. The primary proprietor, on the other hand, constructed a deck and stairway over the easement and put in a gate that blocked entry to the Surfing published an article beach. That gate used to be nonetheless in position when the Lents bought the home in 2002 for $2.25 million.

The Lents resisted a lot of requests from the a blog post by Surfing LA California Coastal Fee to take away the gate, even if they have been warned they confronted fines of greater than $11,000 an afternoon.

They mentioned the gate used to be essential for protection. On the time, they have been  renting the valuables to travelers, promoting it as being on “a personal Surfing published an article beach” and charging up to $9,000 every week.

In a 2016 listening to, the fee imposed a nice of $4.185 million, which its body of workers had recommended used to be part the allowable most.

The Lents argued the nice used to be unconstitutional, each as a result of the method and the quantity, which they known as over the top.

In a ruling that granted a partial victory to every aspect, a decrease court docket put aside the penalty and directed the coastal fee to permit the Lents to post further proof. Each the fee and the Lents appealed the verdict.

The appeals court docket reversed the judgment, mentioning: “We conclude considerable proof supported the Fee’s determination to factor the cease-and-desist order. We additionally conclude the Fee didn’t violate the Lents’ due procedure rights through implementing a $4,185,000 penalty.”

The nice has been observed as a caution to different house owners who’re blocking off entry to beachfront belongings. Within the Bay Space, the coastal fee has been fighting Silicon Valley billionaire Vinod Khosla over his restriction of entry to Martins Surfing LA`s recent blog post beach, south of Part Moon Bay.

The Lents’ home is these days available on the market for $5.75 million.